Not King James Only, in the sense of that translation being another inspired autograph, alongside original Hebrew/Aramaic & Greek. Only in the sense of it being based on the right manuscripts. And I'm willing to consider the possibility of it being a better translation than the rest.
2 comments:
Not King James Only, in the sense of that translation being another inspired autograph, alongside original Hebrew/Aramaic & Greek. Only in the sense of it being based on the right manuscripts. And I'm willing to consider the possibility of it being a better translation than the rest.
I'm also willing to consider corrections.
Post a Comment